Killing your security

  knowing my self who tends to be lured by debt at this point and not squirreling away cash for the future, I wonder what will happen to my friends when they retire, when they can barely pay their bills and don't always eat every day. Those leaders destroying social security are expecting the poor to put the 10% in the bank when their energy costs have easily consumed at least that in increases while funding for alternative energy has been cut.
  So What will happen when they get to retirement and the money they have given in good faith is not returned when they need it ?
What will happen when those who are hungry decide to take what they need from their neighbors when they feel the results of this breach of contract that has taken their future security away and they are hungry and cold?
What happens when their winter comes and they spent the summer simply surviving?
  I don't believe those planning this, who will have no need of social security payments themselves, have any compassion for the people they would harm, they are totally detatched from those who will despratly need it. They choose to forget or are ignorant of the reasons the system was conceived and developed in the first place. they remember neither the humanitarian nor security reasons that caused their forefathers to enact this plan for the naitions security. They seem to prefer short term gains for long term loss.

  Countries who have no system have higher rates of births, causing starvation and famine, environmental destruction, civil unrest and crime.
The sociologist told the woman with four starving children that if she only had two children they would have enough to eat and was told that the woman needed more children because half of them died (of starvation) and she needed them to take care of her when she was old.
Where the old feel they will have care when elderly they have fewer children and the cost to the land and country is less in the long run since the increase of population causes the need for increased infrastructure, which is often fought by attracting more tax base population needing more support in a never ending cycle.
  I prefer to think these people are ignorant or just stupid rather than maliciously greedy and doing harm with intent, but it seems to me one could argue that either way.

  I personaly have an income that will provide for my older years providing no disasters befall me, but that could change for me and for others who currently are solvent. I gather George has been bailed out more than once and if not for family and friends could have found himself needing the services of this system.
now he will have a public pension that will provide at the taxpayers cost. have they talked about disbanding that system ?
  But the bottom line ?
I was forced to give my money under leagle penalty and interest penalty with the promise that it would be returned to me when I needed it. Somebody is ignoring this breach of contract.

They took my money with a promise of service, I'm going to want it back, with interest.